As per usual with these EDIT pieces, this is a going to be a seriously lengthy read — so make a couple of crumpets and a cup of tea. Sink into a squashy chair and get comfortable. These pieces cannot ever hope to cover everything, but the general idea is that they are comprehensive enough that anyone with zero prior knowledge will by the end understand the key details and nuances.
I will be updating this article over the next few weeks as even after several hours, it doesn't quite do justice to the investment case.
I have covered Amaroq Minerals a handful of times since the IPO and have backed the company as a core portfolio stock since day one. As a reminder, core portfolio stocks are companies we consider to be lower risk but with substantial upside potential — and are signposted by three key characteristics: an exceptional asset, a high quality management team, and serious finance.
Check, check and check.
For some perspective, the only other companies on AIM that enjoy this designation are Sovereign Metals and Jubilee Metals. Greatland Gold will join this elite grouping once financing for Havieron is decided, but for now it only meets two of three criteria.
Let’s start by considering Amaroq’s share price performance; the stock launched its AIM IPO originally as AEX Gold in late July 2020, at price of 45p per share, raising £42.5 million.
At the time, founder and CEO Eldur Ólafsson noted:
‘Our ambition is to become a full-cycle gold mining business of scale in Greenland, with Nalunaq the first project in what we believe could be many from our existing portfolio of gold assets.’
Two years later, the company rebranded to Amaroq — reflecting both its multicommodity exploration venture with ACAM, and a desire to be recognised foremost as a Greenlandic business. For context, ‘Amaroq’ means ‘Arctic Wolf’ in Greenland; you can perhaps recognise an outline of the creature in the company’s logo.
And this wolf is ready to howl at the moon.
AMRQ shares were changing hands for more than 80p earlier in 2024, but they have since fallen to around the 60p level, reflecting the standard profit-taking that tends to occur pre-production. But this 60p level is seeing significant support — and there is a whole host of catalysts coming its way.
AMRQ now has group liquidity of $62.2 million consisting of cash balances, undrawn revolving credit facilities, and undrawn revolving credit overrun facility less trade payables - while the Gardaq Joint Venture that comprises the Strategic Minerals business has available liquidity of $13.5 million as of 30 June 2024.
The July refinancing with Landsbankinn for US$35 million in three Revolving Credit Facilities was important on two fronts; this gives AMRQ the cash it needs to get into production comfortably, but is also a strong signal of confidence from a major creditor.
Let’s dive into the largest licence holder in Greenland.
Set aside the management, the money and the miscellaneous, and all junior resource companies have one flagship asset upon which the major element of their investment case is based. Sometimes, an asset can become as famous as the company — or even more so. I’m not even talking about the Escondida’s or Voisey’s Bay’s of the world. On AIM, Havieron and Kasiya are very much as well-known as Greatland or Sovereign.
But the same cannot yet be said of Nalunaq, the flagship (and likely, money printer) attached to Amaroq Minerals. Let’s change that.
First off, this is only a brief overview of what is a thoroughly complex project. For context, there is a 143 page technical report from mid-2022 you can consult if you have the time; but here’s the clef notes:
Nalunaq is a gold mine, located 30 km northeast of Nanortalik, Greenland’s 10th largest town with a population of approximately 1,350. The site benefits from access to ice-free deep-water fjords and is served by Narsarsuaq international airport 100 km to the north, with connections to Copenhagen and Reykjavik.
Amaroq acquired the Nalunaq gold project in 2015 and has made significant progress since this time in expanding the extent of the resource base through drilling, incorporating a new geological model (the Dolerite Dyke model) to better understand the distribution of the high-grade ore, and in acquiring 60% of the infrastructure required to bring Nalunaq back into production.
The historically operating high grade gold mine of Nalunaq, which yielded approximately 350 thousand ounces of gold (average 15 g/t) between 2004 and 2013, has demonstrated low cost production potential.
The asset has a resource from Q3 2022, prepared by SRK Consulting according to Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014) as required by NI 43-101.
Nalunaq has a Total Inferred Mineral Resource of 355.0Kt @ 28.0g/t Au for 320Koz gold.
At the time, this was a 30% increase in contained gold compared to the previous estimate reported in June 2020 and a 50% increase in average grade — and left Nalunaq within the top 2% in terms of global reported gold resource grades.
Since then, gold has raced off to a record high of >$2,500/oz. And Amaroq has a literal mountain of gold.
They also have the finance to prove it, but first consider the sheer scale of what’s being built:
All remains on track; the Government of Greenland approved the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) for the Nalunaq project in June 2024, while the Impact Benefit Agreement will also be agreed by the end of 2024.
And it could not be about to come online at a better time.
For what it's worth, this is all simply my speculation. With copper, or lithium, or helium, there are massive supply gaps coming down the tracks over the next couple of decades, and in the much longer term, you will see similar problems with the hydrocarbons as easily accessible sources of oil and gas start to run dry.
Gold is different, because while yes, there are many industrial applications, its value is derived from its status as a store of value. For thousands of years, gold has ever been the real asset inflation hedge of choice, and most investors hold at least some of the precious metal in their portfolios.
Why is this? Well, to an extent, it's an insurance policy against widespread financial hellfire. In an apocalyptic scenario where the US empire collapses like every empire before it, an electronic record that you owned shares in a company that used to exist in the former empire will be worthless. Physical gold won't be though.
There's also the fraternity argument. I hold gold. You hold gold. Everyone holds gold. It underperforms equities over time, but if everyone has some, then you should too. To an extent, many hold Bitcoin for the same reason - very few holders could explain how a blockchain works, but nobody wants to be the odd one out.
And gold does tend to hold its value against inflation; the US has been printing dollars like no tomorrow, so in a sense, gold has not risen in dollar terms but simply continues to command a similar proportion of dollars in circulation.
But other than gold, you have a few choices.
Indeed, investing in physical gold coins from a reputable seller like the Royal Mint is attractive not only because there is no capital gains tax to pay, but because it's easy.
Managing a rental property, staying on top of the bond market, or building a cellar for your wines is all effort - gold is truly passive and requires nothing more than a safe place to store it.
Gold vs Bitcoin
But why gold in the first place? Plenty of people think that Bitcoin is the future and more and more investors are picking BTC over GOLD. On the other hand, detractors believe crypto is little more than a Ponzi Scheme, destined for eventual collapse
In one sense, crypto sceptics have a point. Anybody can create a cryptocurrency, and there are already more than 12,000 in circulation. But only a handful of these are serious contenders to become currencies or challenge gold, and of these, even fewer are secure or consistently upgraded.
But this is perhaps a misdirection. Taking a step back, what gives any currency value? The US Dollar, backed by the US government, is currently the world’s reserve currency. But it isn’t tied to any gold standard, any other currency, or backed by any physical asset.
Instead, it holds value because consumers globally accept that it does, as they value the credibility of the US government.
For now.
Cowrie shells, cacao beans, and cattle have all been used as forms of money through history. Multiple agricultural products are still important traded commodities to this day. Yet they all have problems as currencies.
This is because all money (in general) utilises six tangible, physical assets. It must be durable, portable, divisible, fungible, scarce, and accepted by the masses. And — absolutely critical — money becomes more widely adopted the better it fulfils these criteria.
Gold is relatively portable in smaller amounts. It’s fungible, in that one kilogram of gold is chemically very similar if not identical to another. It’s certainly scarce enough, and expensive to get out of the ground. And it has been accepted for millennia as a form of payment, despite issues with fakes.
It is on the other hand tricky to divide. This made the old gold standard a necessary evil, where issued currency is backed by physically deposited gold at central bank locations.
Eventually the gold standard was abandoned altogether, to be replaced with ‘fiat’ or currency based on faith in the issuer.
And the key argument is that cryptocurrency will one day eclipse the current fiat systems of pound, dollar, and euro, because it offers advantages across the six money-defining categories.
Let’s take Bitcoin, by far the most valuable and well-known cryptocurrency, as an example.
The only true problem Bitcoin has is acceptability. While 200 million people use the 'currency,' most use it as an investment rather than as a payments system. But through regulatory change and institutional investment, this is changing rapidly.
Most importantly, it has credibility as its open source, decentralised nature has stood the test of time since its inception.
Of course, various crypto programs, from Ethereum to Cardano, are trying to solve differing financial problems with varying levels of success.
The likelihood is that of the thousands currently online, a handful with develop into full blown currencies. This could help solve the acceptability problem, as more credibility becomes assigned to fewer cryptos. Of course, there are no guarantees in crypto investing. Bitcoin and Ethereum could become the Yahoos of tomorrow. Detractors could also be right, and crypto itself may collapse in the coming global recession.
The vast majority of Bitcoin is held within a small number of wallets - and a mass offloading could be a future problem.
But for people looking for a hedge, consider that the recent market chaos saw Bitcoin, Ethereum and the top tech stocks tank well into the double digits. By contrast, gold fell by 1%.
And whether you like it or not, this makes gold a better HEDGE than Bitcoin at present.
This does not mean Bitcoin will collapse, or that it is a scam...but that claiming it is a hedge is not fair. Every time the equities run scared, Bitcoin falls with them.
Gold demand
There are tons of tailwinds that should see the metal remain elevated:
But the big question is on how gold responds into the future. The received wisdom has always been that when the Federal Reserve increases rates, this makes the return on US dollars more attractive and therefore gold should fall. This hasn't happened. Gold has hit record highs instead.
With rates now starting to fall, theory dictates that gold should rise - but in this topsy turvy world...who knows?
The answer, I suspect, is that trust in other stores of value (and particularly the US dollar) is collapsing. Gold is decoupling from its relationship with the dollar.
Just on an individual level, there is much lower trust in state governments, and by extension, non-gold assets. Consider the average Chinese worker, who has grown up believing that property is the key to wealth.
That worker is watching their worldview crumble with China's buckling real estate sector. But gold doesn't lie.
And as uncertainty grows, so does gold's allure.
The tl;dr version is that everything is firmly on track. 95% of key contract packages are already complete — with contracts for the flotation recovery and dry stack tailings sections building and equipment also due to be completed by the end of this quarter.
At the end of June, the process plant detail design and engineering for phase one was 96% complete, while engineering for phase two has already started and will be done by the end of September.
But much of the mine build is already 100% completed, including plant pad earthworks, civil construction, and the plant building structural steel. The cladding is 94% there, mechanical installation of the crushing circuit is 68% done, and installation of the civil foundations/retaining walls, stockpile reclaimer and stacker conveyor have begun. The TMM and light vehicle workshop construction is also finished and electrical installation by now should be over 80% finished.
Overall, process plant construction is 56% complete.
In terms of mine development, new equipment including two new ST7 scoops and one
new Jumbo drill has arrived. The all-important ramp has been completed to 732 metres, with the first ore round was blasted on June 30th. Amaroq has also continued the sump development which is 75% complete.
Both Mine Arc refuge stations have been commissioned. Construction of the underground main heating system on the 300ml portal has commenced, while the exhaust raise fans for Target Block have been commissioned in preparation for the development of the exploration drift as drilling is planned to commence in September.
Recent exploration
At Nalunaq, all the additional 75 vein sampling from historical core housed has been completed and submitted to ALS for assaying. Meanwhile, drill crews and equipment for surface exploration drilling to enlarge the mineralised zone at the Target Block have mobilised to site.
Following completion of the underground rehabilitation, exploration will now be conducted from underground as well as surface. The 2024 exploration programme aims to provide additional information and data on the Mountain Block and Target Block extensions to the Main Vein as well as assessing continuity and form of the 75 Vein.
Underground drilling locations have been designed and a rig is to be mobilised for operations in Q4 2024. Amaroq intends to continue its target generation programmes in the regions near to Nalunaq and Vagar licences.
Next steps
There are effectively two key catalysts to consider when it comes to Nalunaq: first gold in Q4 2024, and a mineral resource update in Q4 2025. However, the recent quarterly investment call gave the impression that a mineral resource update could be sooner than this, with a 2 million ounce exploration target.
To give an impression of the personnel scale, an additional accommodation wing is also due to be added in Q3 2024 to accommodate up to 120 people on site.
Between June and November, AMRQ will continue to develop new ore drives on levels 732-756, and continue to develop the ramp. The planned development and production rate starts at 110t/day of ore, ramping up significantly over the next couple of years.
Here, we’re going to focus on the newly discovered South Greenland copper district. As someone who loves copper, this really is something to watch.
On 24 January, Amaroq advised that its 2023 drilling programme into the Sava Target West intersected copper mineralisation from surface — with results indicating the existence of a new circa 120km long copper district in South Greenland, running from the Company's Kobberminebugt licence and eastward to the North Sava licence.
At this point, it’s worth noting that Sava is arguably the central flagship exploratory asset, within this copper belt.
Do you want to know how the market reacted to ten dozen kilometres of copper? It did nothing.
The share price did nothing for over a week, and then fell a bit before recovering post-financing.
This is the evidence you need; this copper is not priced in.
VP Exploration James Gilbertson noted that:
‘Our 2023 drill programme at Sava has identified further evidence of a significant copper mineral system at Target West. These results, on previously overlooked ground, suggest the presence of a typical large scale porphyry-style system and are testament to our discovery strategy and geological team. Target West is the first of multiple copper targets within Amaroq's portfolio. We have now confirmed skarn mineralisation with up to 11.6% Cu at Kobberminebugt, porphyry-style mineralisation at Sava with assays up to 2.0% CuEq and numerous other porphyry, and epithermal targets across a belt extending over 120km.’
Regular readers will be able to contextualise, but for clarity, those grades are disgustingly good.
I’d also draw attention to the two different copper mineralisations present:
Skarn is typically higher grade with diverse mineralogy including gold and silver credits. Skarn zones are also generally really well defined; in developed mines, you can literally see where the ore stops, and waste rock begins.
The bad news is that this complex mineralogy can make extraction and processing expensive — the deposit sizes are also usually relatively small, and I’d venture that mining Skarn deposits can be more environmentally damaging than other types for their size.
Porphyry mineralisation is the polar opposite, assuming mineralogy can have opposites. You tend to get lower grades but much, much larger deposits, supporting long-term operations.
While there’s also other mineral credits, the general idea is that you have a consistent, homogenous distribution of copper throughout the deposit — which makes processing easier over the longer term.
The downside is that you need to spend big on capex initially, to get a low cost per ton through
bulk mining techniques. This is time consuming and expensive, leading to long development times. And large scale mines are by their nature environmentally not great (though you need them to decarbonise the world).
The point is that this potential copper belt boasts both styles of mineralisation — so an operator could start by processing the skarn deposit with a small scale operation while waiting years to get the porphyry deposit going.
Let’s imagine a world where Amaroq didn’t have the gold. What would this be worth as a standalone?
The copper exploration is funded for three years through the Gardaq JV and has identified tonnage close to surface. The company is continuing to drill and to locate high grade mineralisation — and expects to ‘define the feasibility of a project such as this after 3-5 years and at that stage establish a pathway towards permitting and development.’
Yes, it’s not an overnight lottery win, but what it is could be game-changing.
As a reminder, the Gardaq JV saw GCAM subscribe for £18 million and be issued 490,000 new shares in the JV vehicle representing 49% control. It’s designed to cover the copper belt, Stendalen (where the nickel is looking very promising), Paatusoq and Kobberminebugt.
Four holes were drilled across two targets on the Sava licence, but Amaroq had identified 36 targets — with results being analysed with the extensive geophysics, flown right across the copper belt, to extract all value ahead of the later Q2 announcement.
At Target West, the 2022 scout drillhole intersected 21m of copper and molybdenum mineralisation in Unit 1 from surface — and was the first target to progress to advanced exploration. Three new holes were drilled in 2023, each intersecting copper molybdenum mineralisation including higher grade zones of up to 18m at 0.31% CuEq.
Again, AMRQ thinks that Target West is a copper porphyry-style orebody, where anything above circa 0.2% grade is considered viable at scale (though some systems can get to 1% grade and beyond). And surface mapping and sampling has identified a copper-molybdenum surface footprint of at least three square kilometres.
At Target North, the scout drillhole didn’t intersect mineralisation. The decision to continue exploration has not yet been made, and holes cost money — but this was a 2km long potential epithermal system and another hole may yet be justified.
What I did like about the announcement is that Amaroq did not attempt to put lipstick on the pig; another hole may be worthwhile but this one didn’t deliver the goods. That’s fine — there’s a reason it’s called exploration, and the overall campaign was a resounding success.
It’s funny, though, because for a while Sava was thought of as worthless. The asset was acquired by Amaroq in early 2021, and is located alongside the Ilimaussaq complex (part of the Gardar Province) which hosts the Kvanefjeld and Tanbreez deposits, which are regarded as world class deposits.
It was initially considered un-prospective (again, read worthless) due to incorrect mapping. This happens more often than you would imagine, but you have to think someone out there is kicking themselves today.
The critical factor to understand is that the company believes that the mineralisation:
‘demonstrates geodynamic association between the Sava and Gardar areas and the Voisey's Bay province in Canada, which host significant magmatic sulphide and REE deposits.’
What’s in Voisey’s Bay?
I’ll tell you dear children.
Just across the Labrador Sea, Vale (the massive titan of industry) operates a genuinely massive nickel and copper/cobalt operation., called Voisey’s Bay mine. For nickel, consider the impact of Stendalen (below) — but before we get there, let’s look at the capex it took to get this mine up and running.
In Canadian Dollars? $3.1 BILLION. In early 2000s money. Mining operations were set to close around 2020 but the company has extended its life until latest 2034 by investing significantly in underground operations.
But closure is at most only a decade away. The cost of decommissioning is probably causing Vale management a few nightmares. Imagine if there were a convenient new massive deposit just across the sea — analogous with your own copper/nickel? Possibly an extension of your own mineralogy?
You’d probably not even have to adjust the thermostat.
How much would Vale pay not just for fresh supply, but to delay the inevitable for another decade or three?
On 31 May (a week ago), Amaroq released another update on the copper. Gilbertson noted:
‘With the assistance of leading independent copper industry experts, we continue to define the emerging South Greenland Copper Belt. This work has now confirmed the region's first copper porphyry system as well as helped to identify 24 further high-potential targets across this belt. Amaroq, through its Gardaq Joint venture, believes that these results warrant further exploration efforts across a broader area of the belt to identify further targets. Our 2024 field program will leverage the knowledge developed so far on Target West and direct exploration efforts on these new high-potential targets.’
With expert support, of results to date from Target West, the company has now CONFIRMED the project as a copper-molybdenum porphyry/intrusion related body, significantly strengthening the case for a major copper belt.
And the share price? It did nothing.
Nothing.
Excitingly, the data now suggests that there may be greater potential to the East (thanks to the excellent work of geologist Steve Garwin), with up to 17 significant new targets defined within the Johan Dahl Land area. For context, a new data review into 2023 Kobberminebugt geophysics has also highlighted the potential for further high-grade copper mineralisation at depth and across two newly defined targets.
The company also combined its Stendalen discoveries (read below) with target generation studies to highlight five more copper-nickel sulphide targets within the same mineral belt. Amaroq is now finalising details for the 2024 exploration programme which:
‘will concentrate on the discovery and development of copper resources.’
Next targets will be identified from 10,000 line km geophysical data collected in 2023 with particular attention paid to the new porphyry targets identified within the eastern reaches of the copper belt. It’s probably also important to note that Amaroq has the capital (both in terms of money and personnel) to be operationally ready for follow-up work be required on anything significant found.
This is where it starts to get even more compelling. In February, the company announced it had discovered a ‘significant new strategic metal project 60km from Nalunaq’ with drill results confirming ‘the presence of high tenor mineralisation, typical of a high grade Nickel-Copper deposits.’
Within the company’s first scout drillhole, AMRQ intersected over 140 metres of disseminated magmatic sulphides containing nickel, copper & cobalt — so far, lower grade but giving the company the data it needs to target more concentrated massive sulphides expected to be within the deposit.
As this drillhole was only the first into a 6km orebody, you could argue that the exploration upside is exceptional, simply in size terms. Accordingly, Amaroq is hugely upscaling exploration efforts, with at least three drill rigs and a dedicated ground geophysics team working on the asset through 2024.
Geophysical results provided evidence of the location of the feeder zone to the deposit which will therefore be the focus of the 2024 drilling programme. The key components of these results, including sulphide tenors, textures, scale and minerology, are considered similar to globally important nickel - copper deposits.
Yeah, I wonder which one they’re talking about.
Gilbertson specifically noted that
‘This scout programme exceeded all of our expectations. Although the current intersection is disseminated lower grade, the features of the rocks indicate that the magma was dynamic, these Taxite textures are fundamental characteristic of the world's largest high grade nickel-copper deposits, including Talnakh (Noril'sk), Sudbury and Voisey's Bay. Further, the sulphide tenors recorded suggest high grades within the system which are the key objectives for our 2024 exploration.’
Calculation of the tenor of the sulphides, based upon the assays we have so far, imply that Stendalen could host grades similar to analogous deposits, meaning potentially massive sulphides which could hold grades of up to 3-5% nickel equivalent. The metals found so far are hosted solely in sulphides, so strong future metal recoveries can be expected.
CEO Eldur Olafsson enthused that
‘A new mineral discovery such as that seen at Stendalen is the culmination of many years of hard work by the Amaroq geological team and is testament to our belief that South Greenland holds exceptional opportunities to host world class deposits. The discovery of strategic metals such as copper and nickel, critical for the energy transition, in a region with such a strong geopolitical position, cannot be overstated. These initial results give us the confidence to deploy a larger proportion of the Company's Gardaq JV fully funded 3 year exploration programme to this project during 2024 and beyond.’
I have spent the past year or so banging the drum for Amaroq’s gold. And yes, the gold is excellent.
But as a thought experiment, I invite you to consider a world where Nalunaq, Nanoq and Vagar Ridge do not exist — and the company was valued solely on the exploratory copper-nickel assets.
Voisey’s Bay, the deposit not the mine, sold for CAD$4.3 BILLION in 1996. Add in the CAD$3.1 billion in capex costs to develop the project, and then billions more to extend the mine life…
And wonder whether further upside is imminent.
The gold might be a sideshow.
The information presented on this website does not constitute advice, and no party accepts any liability for either accuracy or for investing decisions made using the information provided.
Further, it is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
This website is designed for information only and does not constitute investment or financial advice.
The junior resource segment of the market is typically higher risk and we encourage investors to consider their risk profile and financial resilience.
We do not accept any liability for either accuracy or investing decisions made using the information provided.
We may receive compensation for research.