It’s been a few months since I last took a look at Golden Metal Resources (GMET, GMTLF) —
But the time has come for an update. Before we get started, it’s important to do two things first:
Let’s dive in.
Time to buy Golden Metals now?
As long-time followers will know, I like my shares with a strong investment case and weak sentiment, scooping them up before the fundamentals start to shine through and sentiment improves. This was the strategy last year — with great results.
The problem for would-be investors in GMET looking at the company today, is that the stock is changing hands for 16p, up from less than 8p a year ago. Clearly sentiment is extremely positive, and the stock is unlikely to sink with multiple near-term catalysts ahead. Indeed, I would expect further rises through the rest of 2024 — so the ‘cheap’ shares are long gone.
The good news though is that 16p is still cheap relative to the potential.
With no further ado, here’s the catalysts to consider:
Pilot Mountain remains GMET’s 100%-owned flagship (even if Garfield is gaining ground), and the success of this asset is key to Golden Metal’s corporate strategy. Indeed, while long-term investors can probably name every asset in the portfolio, for the vast majority of potential investors GMET is Pilot and Pilot is GMET.
Fortunately, all seems to be going swimmingly. In addition to the significant garnet potential announced in early February, the company announced on 7 May that the magnetic inversion results of the magnetic high anomalies within Pilot’s Porphyry South target area highlighted a very significant buried magnetic body at depth.
Importantly, the eastern portion of this magnetic body is bordered by a moderate chargeability halo and is directly coincident with a resistivity anomaly further supporting the concept of porphyry potential. Meanwhile, the western portion of the magnetic anomaly extends close to surface where the geophysical operator identified a historical trench with abundant malachite staining.
If this is alien to you, the CEO has explained it all in depth on the company’s Twitter timeline.
GMET has accordingly optimised the drillhole plans to target the core of the highest magnetic shell recorded — and staked a further 12 claims covering 248 acres around the project. Staking costs were presumably low.
Drilling commenced on 13 May (ten days ago), with a phase I program designed to include a minimum of 2,000 metres of diamond drilling and given the strong financial position (see below), GMET could expand this should assays warrant further investigation.
On the drilling, there are a few important observations to consider: first, the project is very close to the lab where core samples will be assessed — so near-term assay results will be coming soon, and continuously.
Second, any technical problems should be easy to resolve as the drilling team on site is based in Reno, which is only a 4 hour round trip to get any replacement parts to site. Anyone who invests in Africa-based companies is currently having their mind blown — and no matter the campaign, there’s always a technical issue at some point.
Third, the company plan is to drill perhaps four or five holes initially, such that if GMET were to drill into a brand new zone with exciting results, they could keep the rig in that particular area rather than rigidly stick to a predefined plan.
Now, this additional drilling is to some extent raising a bar that is already several levels above
alternative projects — Pilot Mountain is already the largest undeveloped Tungsten deposit in the United States — and the element is a critical mineral that is essentially irreplaceable in specific military applications. And whether an export ban goes ahead or not, the US is barring the import of tungsten from China soon.
I’ve gone into detail on what makes Pilot Mountain uniquely attractive for grant funding in depth before, so instead am going to consider how soon that funding could land. It’s important to note that while funding now seems very likely to land, it is not guaranteed until a suit in the US signs on the dotted line.
On that note, the National Defence Industrial Association (NDIA, US-based) has released a presentation to the public, linked here,from 2 May — covering its most recent manufacturing division meeting.
The NDIA is a leading defense industry association in the United States, which plays a crucial role in supporting the defense industrial base through advocacy, networking, and professional development. It’s effectively the key link between US defence corporations and the government.
The theme of the presentation was ‘Defense-Critical Supply Chain Resilience,’ and while I would encourage investors to read the whole thing, the critical slide for GMET investors is number 22.
This slide details the integrated investment roadmap as assigned by MCEIP (Manufacturing Capability Expansion & Investment Prioritisation), which is a government program run by the Office of Industrial Base Policy within the Department of Defense.
Its mission is to address supply chain vulnerabilities and industrial challenges highlighted by the Pentagon, by prioritising investment and resources to incentivise domestic capabilities where it comes to homeland security. The program is not a lightweight — among other things, it relies on the Defense Production Act Investments program, which provides financial incentives to companies to expand production of specific materials or equipment deemed essential for defense needs.
This is important for obvious reasons, because under the specialty metals segment of the slide, a planned effort (which had not been awarded at the date of the presentation), you can see:
‘Tungsten Feasibility Study, Pilot Mtn, NV’
I've enlarged the slide to make it legible on mobile.
Now, I am no Sherlock Holmes, but unless there’s another Pilot Mountain in Nevada in need of grant funding for a feasibility study, it looks like GMET is close to releasing some explosive news.
Even more excitingly, this is just one grant among many that are likely to have been applied for back in June 2023 when the company’s advisor grants advisor Chang Turkmani came on board.
These grants (based on other companies’ timelines) take circa 12 months for approval — so investors may be due both a series of quality assays and grant funding at the same time.
I recently covered Lynas Rare Earths for a blue chip client, and it’s a strange feeling to see the name of that company on the same slide as GMET’s asset — and perhaps speaks to the disconnect between the importance of Pilot Mountain and the company’s market capitalisation.
It doesn’t take a genius to look at that slide and see that even the smallest grants are for millions of dollars — and even if some of the numbers include loans of some kind, Pilot could be due a massive windfall.
Imagine if it’s not $3 million, but $10 million. Or more.
To bring you back to Earth — it’s not granted. Yet.
For some added speculation, I’d venture a few guesses on the timeline. There may be some kind if political element to the funding — unofficially or not, it may be that before getting awarded a grant, the company needs to conduct some drilling themselves. If you want the US government to back you, you have to back yourselves; in the same way as management stakes in a company matters.
It could be that the parameters of any potential feasibility study are still being negotiated. For example, the kind of study that GMET could do would be smaller than what a major could accomplish regardless of cash available — and strikingly, the slide lists the project and NOT the company, which could imply they expect the study itself to be conducted by a larger company.
And besides, the best place to build a mine or find a resource, is where one has already been before.
And the rest....
Beyond Pilot, there are three more factors to consider:
1. Finances
Golden Metal has an enviable financial position — on 11 March, it raised £750,000 at a 5.3% PREMIUM (sorry, but what’s that? Been a while) of 15p per share from a single investor to explore more of Garfield and help with all the shenanigans at Pilot. This investor also got some two-year warrants at 25p per share, which is very much fair enough.
There have also been masses of warrants exercised, and yet the share price has held up — leaving the company well capitalised AND suggesting that those exercising their warrants are holding their shares. There’s also circa £3.5 million in warrants at 17p to exercise, and if I’m right in the share price trajectory, this will be the company’s source of funding through the rest of 2024 other than the grants.
2. Garfield
With what could be another company’s flagship, GMET’s second asset feels very much like a gym buddy who’s coming a bit too close to your personal best on the Bench Press.
Most recently, GMET announced yesterday that it has staked further land to increase Garfield’s project area from 909 acres to 2,268 acres — around 1,400 UK football pitches, and a 67% increase in size.
For context, it’s a good idea to get this land as others will be paying attention to Garfield’s growing potential. Staking is all about competition rather than capital costs; it’s cheap to do, but this means it’s easy for somebody else to stake adjacent plots.
The company notes that there is ‘growing evidence that a buried copper porphyry system may exist at Garfield,’ and further that this ground covers ‘an additional magnetic geophysical high target which was partially imaged during the previously completed ground magnetic survey as well as a combined total of 25 historical datapoints.’
GMET is finalising exploration plans, with CEO Oliver Friesen — who was recently on site — enthusing that:
‘To see the size and scale of the copper mineralisation evident at surface within the newly staked ground and, more importantly across the entire Garfield footprint, was very exciting. I also visited multiple strongly copper mineralised sites proximal and near to the buried magnetic targets identified and announced last week, which has further enhanced our excitement about those particular porphyry targets.’
3. Nuclear Fusion technology
The wider investing world is asleep to this, but a tokamak reactor in France called WEST just made an absolutely massive breakthrough in nuclear fusion technology.
For reference, current nuclear power is fission-based, which comes with a host of problems. But fusion at scale would create no harmful emissions, with the main byproduct being helium only.
It can be fuelled via hydrogen isotopes obtainable through water, and therefore would be effectively limitless and extremely cheap. Fusion releases millions of times more energy than fossil fuels and is much safer than fission as there is no risk of a runaway chain reaction like with fission. And it also produces very limited radioactive waste.
It’s essentially the Holy Grail of energy — and the stumbling block has been containing the heat of the hot plasma created during the process. But this French reactor was upgraded from a carbon interior to a tungsten interior, and was accordingly capable of containing plasma at 50 MILLION DEGREES CELSIUS, for a full six minutes, and at higher energies and densities than has ever been achieved in the past.
Further, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor recently decided to make the switch from beryllium to tungsten — this is the key global nuclear fusion project, which is a joint collaboration between China, the European Union, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the United States — and is expected to be operational in late 2025.
It’s like the Space Station, it doesn’t matter what wars are going on — this joint project is happening. And while it may be some way off, if ever, you only need to look at the creation of the internet, or the car, or more recently the AI boom, to see how fast tech can develop, and how quickly tungsten demand could explode.
Golden Metal Resources is continuing to expand and better understand Pilot Mountain, the largest undeveloped tungsten deposit in the United States. Tungsten itself is becoming supply critical for both defence and energy sector applications — in the face of a geopolitical supply crunch. The asset is on the verge of significant grant funding, the company is well capitalised with an extremely supportive investor base, and its secondary asset Garfield is also close to material news.
Another 100%? Yes please..
The information presented on this website does not constitute advice, and no party accepts any liability for either accuracy or for investing decisions made using the information provided.
Further, it is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
This website is designed for information only and does not constitute investment or financial advice.
The junior resource segment of the market is typically higher risk and we encourage investors to consider their risk profile and financial resilience.
We do not accept any liability for either accuracy or investing decisions made using the information provided.
We may receive compensation for research.